Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42855542›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026

Cribriform and intraductal carcinoma in prostate cancer - implications for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

Rui M Bernardino, João Lobo, Zeyad Schwen, Theodorus van der Kwast, Adam B Weiner, Robert E Reiter, Jane K Nguyen, Estevão Lima, Robert Stein, Nicolas Soputro and 16 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Rui M BernardinoGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8076-4550
João LoboDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-1391
Zeyad SchwenGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Theodorus van der KwastLaboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-5786
Adam B WeinerCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Robert E ReiterUCLA Department of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jane K NguyenDiagnostics Institute, Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Estevão LimaSchool of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1962-7968
Robert SteinGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nicolas SoputroGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Rashed GhandourGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Alp Tuna BeksacGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6742-0040
Karim DaherGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ricardo LeãoSchool of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mark L GonzalgoDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, USA.
Roderick van den BerghErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Juan GaristoNewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Giancarlo MarraCittà della Salute e della Scienza e Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Jennifer Le Guévelou KammererLaboratoire du traitement du signal et de l'image, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Sara M FalzaranoDepartment of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1559-7754
Cristina Magi-GaluzziDepartment of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1219-3797
Cosimo De NunzioDepartment of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2190-512X
Susan PrendevilleLaboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Neil FleshnerPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jihad KaoukGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-6069
Riccardo AutorinoGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. ricautor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7045-7725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC) and invasive cribriform carcinoma (invasive Crib) are closely related high-risk morphologies that frequently coexist and are associated with adverse pathology, early metastasis and disease-specific mortality across the prostate cancer continuum. These morphologies are common in intermediate- and high-risk disease, but remain under-recognized and inconsistently reported, contributing to undergrading and potentially inappropriate selection of patients for de-escalation strategies such as active surveillance or focal therapy. Biopsy detects these patterns in only about half of affected men, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted sampling does not reliably close this gap. These tumours are enriched for loss of the tumour-suppressor gene PTEN, DNA-damage-repair alterations and genomic instability, and are associated with immunologically 'cold', fibroblast-rich tumour niches. These findings provide a rationale for evaluating biomarker-directed strategies, including inhibition of the PARP and AKT pathways and therapies targeting B7-H3 (also known as CD276). However, definitive evidence that either IDC or invasive Crib predicts benefit from any of these treatments has not been established. A deeper understanding of the biological and clinical behaviour of these tumours, together with rigorous, standardized reporting, is essential for accurate risk stratification, rational use of active surveillance and focal approaches, selection of patients for intensified local and systemic treatment, and the design of biomarker-driven trials for this aggressive disease subset.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.