ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
Cribriform and intraductal carcinoma in prostate cancer - implications for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC) and invasive cribriform carcinoma (invasive Crib) are closely related high-risk morphologies that frequently coexist and are associated with adverse pathology, early metastasis and disease-specific mortality across the prostate cancer continuum. These morphologies are common in intermediate- and high-risk disease, but remain under-recognized and inconsistently reported, contributing to undergrading and potentially inappropriate selection of patients for de-escalation strategies such as active surveillance or focal therapy. Biopsy detects these patterns in only about half of affected men, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted sampling does not reliably close this gap. These tumours are enriched for loss of the tumour-suppressor gene PTEN, DNA-damage-repair alterations and genomic instability, and are associated with immunologically 'cold', fibroblast-rich tumour niches. These findings provide a rationale for evaluating biomarker-directed strategies, including inhibition of the PARP and AKT pathways and therapies targeting B7-H3 (also known as CD276). However, definitive evidence that either IDC or invasive Crib predicts benefit from any of these treatments has not been established. A deeper understanding of the biological and clinical behaviour of these tumours, together with rigorous, standardized reporting, is essential for accurate risk stratification, rational use of active surveillance and focal approaches, selection of patients for intensified local and systemic treatment, and the design of biomarker-driven trials for this aggressive disease subset.
Identifiers
42855542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.