ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Deep learning-based semantic segmentation of abdominal wall layers during direct optical trocar insertion: toward AI-assisted surgical access.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe initial entry phase of minimally invasive surgery-direct optical trocar insertion (DOTI)-remains high risk due to potential spatial disorientation. To our knowledge, this pilot study investigates a deep learning-based semantic segmentation framework for identifying critical abdominal wall layers during DOTI.
methodsFrom 10 DOTI procedures, 951 frames were extracted and pixel-wise annotated into three anatomical classes-rectus muscle, rectus sheath, and peritoneum-plus background. A DeepLabV3+ architecture with ResNet-50 backbone was trained using five-fold cross-validation. Performance was assessed by mean Intersection over Union (mIoU), mean Dice coefficient (mDice), precision, recall, and F1-score.
resultsThe model achieved a mean IoU of 0.794 (95% CI 0.785-0.802) and a mean Dice of 0.883 (95% CI 0.878-0.889). Class-specific Dice scores were 0.923 for rectus muscle, 0.903 for rectus sheath, and 0.824 for peritoneum. Confusion matrix analysis showed minimal direct confusion between anatomical tissue classes (0.0-0.3%), with most errors confined to tissue-background boundaries.
conclusionThis pilot single-center study demonstrates the technical feasibility of deep learning-based semantic segmentation for extra-abdominal tissue-layer identification during optical trocar insertion. Although the model showed consistent performance across five-fold cross-validation, the small patient cohort limits generalizability, and larger multi-center and prospective studies are required before clinical translation. The proposed framework provides a preliminary basis for future investigation of AI-assisted surgical guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855513What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.