Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42855234›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

How representative are responders to the english cancer patient experience survey of english breast cancer patients? A cohort study using linked national cancer patient experience survey and cancer registry data.

Sarah Blacker, Jemma Boyle, Liyang Wang, Diana R Withrow, Christine Delon, Jibby Medina, Kieran Horgan, David Dodwell, Mark Verrill, Agnieszka Lemanska and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sarah BlackerClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK sblacker@rcseng.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-8260
Jemma BoyleClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-957X
Liyang WangClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2675-4703
Diana R WithrowClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
Christine DelonClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5163-1716
Jibby MedinaClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
Kieran HorganDept of Breast Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
David DodwellNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8787-4904
Mark VerrillNorthern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Agnieszka LemanskaFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Adam E FramptonFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
David A CromwellClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Breast surgeryBreast tumoursHealth SurveysPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42855234
PMCPMC13656145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.