Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42854674›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Non-Physician Areas in Japan: Typological Classification Based on Regional Demographic Characteristics.

Takashi Kuwayama, Kazuhiko Kotani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takashi KuwayamaCenter for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-City, Tochigi, 3290498, Japan, +81-285-58-7394.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4978-8652
Kazuhiko KotaniCenter for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-City, Tochigi, 3290498, Japan, +81-285-58-7394.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8119-633X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Across Japan, there are "non-physician areas" where medical institutions are not present and health care access is difficult. Although these areas are defined as a single administrative category, they may vary according to regional demographic characteristics. Understanding this possible heterogeneity may be important for developing more context-sensitive strategies to improve health care accessibility. Objective: This study examined whether non-physician areas can be classified based on regional demographic characteristics using an unsupervised machine learning model. Methods: A total of 590 non-physician areas were identified from the national survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (2019). Data on regional demographic characteristics were also obtained. After Results: The optimal number of clusters was 3 (silhouette score=0.266), indicating that non-physician areas could be classified into 3 types. The cluster distributions of the training and validation datasets were consistent (Jensen-Shannon distance=0.017; Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that administratively defined non-physician areas in Japan are not uniform and can be classified into 3 demographically distinct types. The typology may provide a framework for understanding differences not captured by the current administrative designation and for considering more context-sensitive health care strategies.

Indexed as

DemographyHealth Services AccessibilityCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsHumansJapanPrincipal Component AnalysisSurveys and Questionnairesclustermachine learningnon-physician areasregional characteristicsrural health care

Identifiers

PMID42854674
PMCPMC13652521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.