ArticlePoultry science2026
Effect of dietary inclusion of chitosan on growth performance and blood indices of broiler chickens.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of dietary low-molecular-weight chitosan (LMWCHT) on the growth performance, carcass traits, cecal microbial populations, and blood indices of broiler chickens. A completely randomised design was used to assign 96 unsexed day-old Cobb 500 broiler chicks to four dietary treatment groups. Each treatment consisted of four replicate pens with six birds per pen (n = 4 pens per treatment). Following a 7-day commercial starter diet period, the birds were fed diets supplemented with LMWCHT at 0.00 (control), 0.25, 0.50, or 0.75 g/kg for a 35-day experimental period (Days 8 to 42). Growth performance metrics, averaged on a pen basis, showed that LMWCHT supplementation significantly altered average daily gain (ADG), final body weight, and average daily feed intake (P < 0.05). Broilers fed 0.50 g/kg LMWCHT exhibited the highest ADG and body weight, whereas those fed 0.75 g/kg optimised the feed conversion ratio. Cecal microbial analysis revealed that LMWCHT significantly reduced Escherichia coli counts compared to the control group (P < 0.05) without establishing a graded dose response among the inclusion levels, while lactic acid bacteria populations remained statistically unaffected (P = 0.212). Dietary LMWCHT significantly modified the haematological and serum biochemical profiles (P < 0.05), altering haemoglobin, neutrophils, monocytes, albumin, globulin, and total protein concentrations. Although the 0.50 g/kg inclusion level maintained serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) within the standard physiological range, ALT elevations observed at 0.25 and 0.75 g/kg suggest a narrow threshold for hepatic tolerance. These results indicate that while LMWCHT alters specific performance, blood, and cecal E. coli parameters, the inclusion levels must be carefully calibrated to balance growth efficiency with systemic physiological safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.