ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026
Assessing the Willingness of Future Health Care Providers to Participate in Vaccine Trials: Cross-Sectional VACCELERATE European Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Future health professionals are expected to recommend vaccines, communicate with patients about vaccine safety, and support clinical trial literacy and recruitment during public health emergencies. However, their own willingness to participate in vaccine trials, and the barriers that shape that willingness, remain incompletely characterized across Europe. Objective: This study aimed to assess willingness to participate in future vaccine trials among European students in health-related disciplines and to describe their perceived barriers, motivations, vaccine attitudes, and preferred sources of health information. Methods: We conducted an open, multilingual, cross-sectional web survey within the VACCELERATE network from June to November 2023. National coordinators distributed the survey through institutional mailing lists, student associations, and program channels in participating European countries. Eligible participants were students aged 18 years or older enrolled in medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, psychology, biomedical sciences, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, or other health-related programs. The questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics, primary sources of health information, vaccine attitudes, willingness to participate in future vaccine trials, barriers among unwilling or unsure respondents, and motivations for participation. Analyses were descriptive, and denominators varied by item because nonmandatory questions could be skipped. Results: Of 1381 eligible respondents, 1192 (86.3%) answered the primary willingness question: 32.9% (n=392) were willing to participate in a future vaccine trial, 38.8% (n=463) were unsure, and 28.3% (n=337) were unwilling. Among the 769 respondents who were unwilling or unsure and selected barriers, the most frequent concerns were potential side effects (n=574, 74.6%) and not wanting to be a "test subject" (n=276, 35.9%). Among 1289 respondents included in the motivation analysis, commonly selected motivators included knowing the risks and side effects involved (n=575, 44.6%), becoming part of the solution to an important health problem (n=584, 45.3%), and knowing that personal safety would be protected (n=500, 38.8%). Conclusions: In this multicountry European sample of health professional students, only one-third reported willingness to participate in future vaccine trials, while the largest group was unsure. The findings suggest that trial-readiness initiatives for future health professionals should prioritize transparent communication about safety monitoring, risks and side effects, participant protections, and the practical conduct of vaccine trials. Because recruitment used an open convenience approach, the results should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis generating rather than representative of all European health professional students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.