ArticleJMIR AI2026
Multilingual Disparities in Large Language Model-Based Symptom Detection for Global Disease Surveillance: Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Symptom detection is essential in global disease surveillance to detect potential outbreaks, as symptoms are the first observable signs of infection. To reflect real-time ground truth conditions during pandemics, social media has emerged as a valuable data source. Moreover, effective digital disease surveillance systems must operate across diverse linguistic settings, and large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform inconsistently across languages, tending to have lower performance in low-resource languages. While multilingual approaches have been explored in various health-related natural language processing tasks, a critical gap remains in understanding whether LLM-based symptom detection can perform consistently across languages for global disease surveillance. Southeast Asia demonstrates this challenge, combining diverse languages and the potential for emerging infectious disease outbreaks, making it a case for evaluating how multilingual performance disparities manifest in symptom detection. Objective: This study aims to evaluate multilingual disparities in symptom detection using a LLM, as well as the associated error mechanisms across languages and symptom types, to better understand their implications for global disease surveillance. Methods: This study uses the MedWeb dataset, a multilingual pseudo-social media text dataset with multiple symptom labels. The data consist of 12 languages, covering diverse regions and language resource classifications. The symptoms included in this study are fever, headache, runny nose, cough, diarrhea, hay fever, influenza, and cold. We used GPT-5 as the symptom detection system, representing a strong model for health-related tasks. The results are evaluated using the macro precision, recall, and Results: Our findings show that performance varied across languages, language resource groups, and symptom types. Southeast Asian (SEA) languages generally achieved lower scores than non-SEA languages, with Japanese obtaining the highest Conclusions: Due to performance disparities, achieving more reliable and equitable LLM-based symptom detection from social media text for global disease surveillance would benefit from broader representation in training data for low-resource languages, improved cultural and linguistic sensitivity, and stronger contextual understanding of symptom-related expressions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.