Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42853971›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Priorities and Implementation Barriers in End-to-End Digital Transformation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Sequential Mixed Methods Analysis.

Isaac Rogelio Rodriguez-Chavez, Adama Ibrahim, Baris Ersezer, Angela Radcliffe, Victoria Gamerman, Bert Hartog, Lars Fogh Iversen, Marcus Schindler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isaac Rogelio Rodriguez-Chavez *4Biosolutions Consulting, 510 Bradford Dr, Rockville, MD, 20850, United States, 1 2406725850.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-8381
Adama Ibrahim *Novo Nordisk, Måløv, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2541-7701
Baris ErsezerNovartis, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1442-1535
Angela RadcliffeHow Mighty We Ventures, Huntingdon Valley, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3716-2555
Victoria GamermanRWD Insights, Stamford, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-5684
Bert HartogHartog Digital Health Consulting, Middelburg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6631-2379
Lars Fogh IversenNovo Nordisk, Måløv, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0558-3392
Marcus SchindlerNovo Nordisk, Måløv, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3016-5366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The pharmaceutical industry faces unprecedented challenges, including declining drug approval rates, plummeting research and development returns, and escalating protocol complexity. Digital transformation represents the most promising end-to-end approach for addressing these challenges, yet there is limited understanding of industry-wide priorities and implementation barriers. Objective: This study aimed to identify digital transformation priorities across diverse pharmaceutical industry stakeholders and to explore the specific barriers preventing successful implementation through a collaborative, mixed methods approach. Methods: The study used a sequential mixed methods design with three phases: (1) workshop 1 in Copenhagen, Denmark, with 47 participants randomly divided into 3 working groups, all discussing three main theme areas and generating 110 digital transformation topics; (2) a follow-up online survey of workshop 1 participants (administered 4 wk after workshop 1); and (3) workshop 2 in Boston, United States, with expert keynote and panel discussions exploring implementation challenges. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling through industry networks and professional associations. The study was conducted between March 2023 and June 2025 across international workshop sites in Copenhagen and Boston. Data sources included workshop outputs, survey responses, and transcribed panel discussions. Analysis involved thematic coding, convergence analysis, and tension identification. Results: Workshop 1 identified 19 common categories across all working groups, despite the 3 diverse starting themes. Workshop 1 produced 7 consolidated categories for theme 1 (desired outcomes), 5 for theme 2 (pathways), and 7 for theme 3 (measuring success), totaling 19 consolidated categories. The survey achieved a 55.3% (26/47 participants) response rate and identified patient-centered outcomes, FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable)-aligned data practices, collaboration, access and equity, and the reduction of patient burden as leading priorities. Workshop 2 identified 5 key implementation tensions: innovation speed vs safety standards, collaboration vs competition, technology vs change management, patient preferences vs operational efficiency, and data democratization vs privacy protection. Panel discussions provided deep insights into implementation challenges and solutions. The results obtained support exploratory generalization across comparable settings and do not establish causal effects. Conclusions: The pharmaceutical industry demonstrates strong consensus on patient-centric digital transformation priorities across the value chain, with universal recognition of the need for precompetitive collaboration. However, significant implementation barriers exist beyond technology, requiring integrated approaches to organizational change, regulatory innovation, and industry-wide standards development. Panel discussions and expert insights provide a pathway for continued collaboration and knowledge sharing. An incremental approach to sharing industry-wide knowledge is further recommended.

Indexed as

Drug IndustryDenmarkHumansSurveys and Questionnaireschange managementclinical trialsdata governancedigital transformationFAIR data principlesFindable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusablehealth equityimplementation barriersmixed methods researchorganizational innovationpatient-centered carepharmaceutical industrytechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID42853971
PMCPMC13651978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.