ArticleScience advances2026
Wildfires diminish vegetation control on surface runoff.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wildfires are increasingly reshaping global terrestrial ecosystems, yet their impacts on the fundamental coupling between vegetation and the hydrological cycle remain poorly understood. Here, we present a global-scale assessment of how wildfire disturbances alter the sensitivity of surface runoff to vegetation dynamics using multidecadal satellite observations and reanalysis datasets. We developed a spatially explicit framework to quantify pre- and postfire runoff-vegetation sensitivity across climatic gradients and fire regimes. We show a widespread and systematic weakening of vegetation control on runoff after wildfires, indicating a fundamental decoupling of hydrology-vegetation interactions. This attenuation is notably modulated by aridity and fire intensity, with the most pronounced sensitivity losses occurring in fragile drylands. These findings expose a critical blind spot in traditional hydrological models that overlook disturbance-driven vegetation shifts. Our study provides a mechanistic understanding of how compound climate-fire perturbations accelerate terrestrial water flux instability, suggesting that increasing fire frequency will exacerbate ecosystem vulnerability and threaten water security in a warming world.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.