ArticlePloS one2026
Regional characterization and the influence of mineralogy on the swelling of lime-treated expansive soils.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expansive soils pose significant challenges in geotechnical engineering due to their tendency to swell when wet and shrink when dry. They present serious issues and challenges to light structures and pavements. Treatment using hydrated lime is one of the stabilization techniques that is widely used to improve the performance of these soils. This study aims to examine the behavior of volume change for three types of expansive clays from three different locations in Saudi Arabia that are classified as expansive. Experimental work covered lime-treated and untreated clay. The influence of lime content and curing period is monitored. Four lime contents: 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8% by weight of dry clay were investigated. All tested samples were investigated at three different curing periods: 1, 10, and 28 days. Laboratory investigation included determining pH values, conducting one-dimensional odometer tests, and measuring suction. To achieve a 90% reduction in the swell potential of expansive clays, it was found that Tabuk clay requires at least 2-3% lime addition, while Al-Qatif clay requires 3-4% lime addition. Al-Ghatt clay requires more than 4% to reduce the swelling potential by 90%. These differences are attributed to the mineralogy of the clay and the pozzolonic reactions as a result of adding hydrated lime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.