ArticlePloS one2026
Efficient and real-time polyp segmentation: An empirical evaluation of lightweight Mamba integration strategies.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and efficient polyp segmentation is essential for computer-aided colorectal cancer screening, yet achieving a favorable balance among segmentation accuracy, computational efficiency, and cross-dataset generalization remains challenging. Recent studies suggest that Mamba-based state-space modeling can enhance long-range dependency modeling with relatively low complexity, but how lightweight Mamba integration strategies affect dense prediction frameworks for polyp segmentation remains insufficiently understood. In this study, we present LiteMamba-Seg, a lightweight polyp segmentation framework built on a U-Net-like encoder-decoder architecture with a ResNet34 backbone, and conduct an empirical evaluation of different lightweight Mamba integration strategies. Specifically, we investigate bottleneck-only integration as well as alternative second-stage placements at an encoder-side intermediate stage and a decoder-side reconstruction stage. Experimental results on four public benchmark datasets show that LiteMamba-Seg achieves competitive segmentation performance while maintaining a lightweight design and real-time model-level inference, with 26.81 M parameters, 13.89 GFLOPs, and 167.73 FPS. Further ablation, controlled placement, multi-seed, robustness, boundary, calibration, and false-positive analyses indicate that the effect of Mamba integration depends on its placement within the network. In particular, decoder-side reconstruction-stage integration yields more favorable quantitative and qualitative results than encoder-side intermediate placement across the evaluated benchmarks. These findings suggest that, for lightweight polyp segmentation frameworks, Mamba integration should be considered jointly with placement strategy rather than simply increasing the number of sequence modeling blocks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.