ArticlePloS one2026
CNN-based dual-morphology mosquito recognition and mobile deployment.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mosquito-borne diseases pose a severe global public health threat. Accurate and rapid identification of mosquito species, sex, and developmental stages is critical for effective vector control and disease prevention.Traditional morphological identification is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and highly dependent on expert experience.To address these limitations, we developed a deep learning-based mosquito detection system that integrates adult and larval morphology for recognition and can be deployed on mobile devices.We constructed a dual-morphology mosquito dataset containing 2,683 images, covering three major disease-transmitting genera (Aedes, Culex, Anopheles), including adult males and females, as well as Aedes and Culex larvae. We compared five object detection algorithms: YOLOv8, YOLOv5, SSD, Faster R-CNN. The results showed that YOLOv8 achieved the best comprehensive performance, with precision = 0.988, recall = 0.990, mAP50 = 0.992, F1-score = 0.99, and only 2.7 M parameters, enabling fast inference suitable for mobile deployment.We further implemented the optimized YOLOv8 model on Android mobile platforms using the NCNN framework. The system supports both static image recognition and real-time video detection with high accuracy. This study provides a portable, automated, and practical tool for on-site mosquito surveillance, which can help improve the efficiency and accuracy of vector-borne disease control programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.