ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Factors associated with the unmet need for spacing and limiting family planning: Evidence from a national survey.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional binary frameworks tend to combine the various aspects of unmet family planning needs into one general category. This study evaluates unmet family planning needs by first using conventional multinomial logistic regression to determine baseline demographic risk profiles. It then applies machine learning methods such as Random Forest and XGBoost to see if they can provide further insights into non-linear patterns and complex interactions between features that standard regression might miss. Using data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS 2022), we built a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model. Additionally, we applied sophisticated ensemble classifiers such as Random Forest and XGBoost, paired with a synthetic hybrid resampling technique (SMOTE) to address severe class imbalance. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm, and we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to visualize complex global patterns and interaction effects. Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between unmet needs and maternal age, parity, wealth, residence, and decision-making power (p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that having more children (4 or more) greatly increased the likelihood of unmet needs for spacing (aOR = 20.60) and limiting (aOR = 2.24). Wealth was notably protective against unmet needs for limiting, especially for the richest quintile (aOR = 0.48). Although SHAP analysis offered exploratory insights into complex, non-linear interactions between residence and factors such as parity and education, the predictive accuracy of tree-based models (Random Forest, XGBoost) was only moderate, with macro-averaged AUCs comparable to those of traditional regression. Therefore, population-level conclusions are most reliably drawn from the MLR model. The limitations of cross-sectional survey data as a diagnostic tool show that spacing needs are often fluid, transient, and shaped by relationships. Addressing the unmet need gap involves moving away from broad media campaigns toward localized counseling, ensuring stable rural spacing supplies, and involving husbands and mothers-in-law to turn reproductive healthcare into a shared household conversation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.