ReviewPLoS pathogens2026
Why does rotavirus vaccine effectiveness vary around the globe?
Review in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rotavirus vaccines have transformed the prevention of severe childhood diarrhea globally, yet their effectiveness remains markedly lower in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where rotavirus mortality is greatest. Understanding the biological and environmental determinants of this disparity is critical for optimizing existing vaccination strategies and informing next-generation vaccine development. This review examines the factors contributing to variable rotavirus vaccine effectiveness across different settings, with a focus on maternal antibodies, infant gut health, co-infections, co-vaccinations and human genetic polymorphisms. Maternal antibodies, transferred transplacentally and through breast milk, can inhibit vaccine replication in the infant gut. Maternal antibody interference may be exacerbated in LMICs due to higher maternal antibody levels, driven by increased rates of natural rotavirus exposure and prolonged breastfeeding. Malnutrition, disruption of the gut microbiome, and environmental enteric dysfunction collectively impair intestinal immune responses, with their relative contributions also varying by geography. Co-administration of the oral poliovirus vaccine and concurrent enteric infections represent additional sources of interference that are more prevalent in resource-limited settings. Host genetic factors, particularly polymorphisms in fucosyltransferase genes governing histo-blood group antigen expression, further modulate vaccine immunogenicity across populations. These factors do not act in isolation; rather, they interact to shape the gut environment and collectively limit oral vaccine replication. Addressing rotavirus vaccine inequity will require context-specific strategies that combine optimized vaccine scheduling, nutritional and microbiome-targeted interventions, and the development of novel vaccine platforms capable of overcoming the unique immunological challenges of LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.