ArticlePloS one2026
Benchmarking ensemble and deep learning models for drought-responsive gene prioritisation in rice using multi-omics data.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying drought-responsive genes is critical for climate-resilient crop breeding, yet computational gene-trait association often relies on single-omics or generalized genomic datasets. Optimal algorithm selection for high-dimensional, small multi-omics datasets also remains a persistent challenge. We present a machine learning framework that extends the QTG-Finder feature set by integrating transcriptomic and proteomic features to classify drought-responsive genes in rice. Using MBKBase annotations, we evaluated the ability of these models to prioritise 336 drought-responsive genes among 2,416 abiotic stress-associated genes, of which the remaining 2,080 constituted an operational background set. We tested four algorithms: Random Forest, XGBoost, one-dimensional convolutional neural network, and multilayer perceptron, while addressing severe class imbalance and assessing model stability. Tree-based ensemble methods achieved higher performance than the deep learning models in this dataset, which showed early overfitting. The fine-tuned Random Forest achieved a recall of 0.67 and an AUC-ROC of 0.87 under nested cross-validation, conditional on a feature matrix assembled before gene-level data splitting. Across repeated evaluations of a small internal holdout of 10 genes, mean accuracy and recall were 0.90 and 0.63; this set is too small to support a generalizability claim and is reported only as a consistency check. The newly added transcriptomic and proteomic features improved recall from 0.47 to 0.67 compared with genomics alone. Feature importance and ablation analyses indicated that transcriptomics-derived features, particularly measures of expression distribution, magnitude, and direction, contributed most to predictive performance. Functional enrichment analysis supported the biological relevance of the prioritised genes. These results demonstrate the value of multi-omics integration for gene prioritisation in small tabular datasets while highlighting current limitations of deep learning in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.