Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42853774›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

The complexities and contradictions of online eating disorder content: A qualitative evidence synthesis of young people's views and experiences.

Meena Khatwa, Rebecca Rees, Claire Stansfield, Vidhi Bassi, Ceri-Nicole Wilkins, Kelly Dickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meena KhatwaEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2392-6258
Rebecca ReesEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1413-1952
Claire StansfieldEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Vidhi BassiYoung Advisors on Young People and Online Eating Disorder Content: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Project, Eppi Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ceri-Nicole WilkinsYoung Advisors on Young People and Online Eating Disorder Content: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Project, Eppi Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kelly DicksonEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eating disorders (ED) continue to be a concern worldwide. There is a growing focus on problematic discourse around ideal bodies as well as on how exposure to related content and spaces online might influence disordered eating and other ED symptoms. A qualitative evidence synthesis using thematic synthesis methods was conducted to explore young people's lived experiences of online ED content. Studies were included if they provided, from 2007 onwards, views about online content from young people from OECD countries aged 11-25 years old who identified as having had an eating disorder, disordered eating or eating difficulties. This article focuses on findings from 13 included studies whereby three key themes were identified: Comparing - how online content was used to evaluate others and oneself; Curating - how young people manage this content; and Community - spaces for connection over shared experience. Participants across the studies described the complex 'double-edged' nature of online spaces, which can offer inclusion but can also be experienced as harmful. The synthesis outlined a lack of supportive offline mental health-promoting spaces as part of the context of young people's online content use.

Identifiers

PMID42853774
PMCPMC13652209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.