ArticlePLOS digital health2026
The complexities and contradictions of online eating disorder content: A qualitative evidence synthesis of young people's views and experiences.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eating disorders (ED) continue to be a concern worldwide. There is a growing focus on problematic discourse around ideal bodies as well as on how exposure to related content and spaces online might influence disordered eating and other ED symptoms. A qualitative evidence synthesis using thematic synthesis methods was conducted to explore young people's lived experiences of online ED content. Studies were included if they provided, from 2007 onwards, views about online content from young people from OECD countries aged 11-25 years old who identified as having had an eating disorder, disordered eating or eating difficulties. This article focuses on findings from 13 included studies whereby three key themes were identified: Comparing - how online content was used to evaluate others and oneself; Curating - how young people manage this content; and Community - spaces for connection over shared experience. Participants across the studies described the complex 'double-edged' nature of online spaces, which can offer inclusion but can also be experienced as harmful. The synthesis outlined a lack of supportive offline mental health-promoting spaces as part of the context of young people's online content use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.