ArticleJAMA health forum2026
Pharmacy Benefit Manager Involvement in the US Opioid Crisis.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The opioid crisis in the US has been attributed in part to the pharmaceutical industry's inappropriate marketing of opioid medications. How pharmaceutical companies work with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to increase opioid dispensing has not been studied. Objective: To examine the potential role of PBMs and pharmaceutical companies in the opioid crisis. Design and Setting: A qualitative study using retrospective data was conducted of opioid industry documents released in litigation that have been collected and preserved digitally at the University of California, San Francisco, and Johns Hopkins University Opioid Industry Documents Archive. Data collection was conducted from January to April 2026, with iterative keyword searches. Documents were identified in searches chronologically, then results were categorized by theme. Main Outcomes and Measures: Research of pharmaceutical industry documents to assess professional and financial relationships between PBMs and opioid manufacturers. Results: This study of 23 pharmaceutical industry documents dated from 1997 to 2018 identified 3 major themes in the coordinated activities of opioid manufacturers and PBMs: (1) both manufacturers and PBMs encouraged health care professionals to increase opioid prescribing, (2) PBMs expanded the allowed doses and durations of opioid prescriptions, and (3) opioid manufacturers paid PBMs when dispensing of branded opioids increased. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that PBMs and opioid manufacturers had undisclosed financial relationships that may have exacerbated the opioid crisis. Regulatory restrictions on these relationships, including the elimination of rebates, could increase transparency and reduce the risks of public health harm due to misuse of addictive medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.