Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42853531›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2026

Anticoagulation practices in venous occlusive disease after stent placement.

Omar Ayman, Olivia Antonescu, Warren A Campbell, Hyeonjeong Lim, Eunjee Lee, Jeffrey F B Chick, David Shin, Mina S Makary

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Omar Ayman *Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Olivia Antonescu *Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Warren A CampbellDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. wac3ua@uvahealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4913-5945
Hyeonjeong LimDepartment of Information and Statistics, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Eunjee LeeDepartment of Information and Statistics, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Jeffrey F B ChickDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David ShinDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mina S MakaryDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCharacterize physician anticoagulation practices after stent placement in patients with venous occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND

methodsSurvey-based analysis was conducted between January 2023 and April 2023 (for 109 days) evaluating practices of post venous stent placement anticoagulation regimens. A survey investigated provider demographics, agent selection, dosing, duration, and patient factors taken in agent choice. The survey was distributed through email lists and promoted on social media and limited users to one response. Questions stratified for both superior vena cava (SVC) and upper extremity and inferior vena cava (IVC) and lower extremity interventions. Descriptive statistics determined the significance of the regimen utilization.

resultsOne hundred twenty-nine respondents participated in the study, with interventional radiologists constituting 94%. The preferred regimen for SVC interventions was direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and single antiplatelet therapy, accounting for 39/117 of respondents. For IVC interventions, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and single antiplatelet therapy was the regimen of choice representing 12/38 of preferences. SVC intervention therapy duration was most common to be lifetime for aspirin (10; 43%), 3 months for non-ASA antiplatelet agents (23; 52%), and 6 months for anticoagulants (32; 44%). For IVC therapies, the trend of drug duration for aspirin was most common to be lifetime (6;40%), for non-ASA antiplatelets was 3 months (10; 53%), and for anticoagulants tied for 6 and 12 months (7; 30% each). Eight risk factors affected post-intervention anticoagulation selection.

conclusionThis work highlights the most common post-venous stenting anticoagulation regimens currently in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnticoagulationAntiplateletAntithromboticSurveyVeno-occlusive diseaseVenous stent anticoagulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.