ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
ACPSEM guideline: commissioning and quality assurance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linear Accelerators.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MRI-guided radiotherapy introduces unique quality assurance (QA) requirements due to magnetic field effects on dose delivery, imaging-dependent workflows, adaptive planning and system specific considerations. Consistent, vendor agnostic guidance is needed to support safe commissioning, clinical implementation, and ongoing performance monitoring across MRI-Linac platforms. This guideline defines minimum recommended MRI-Linac commissioning and QA practices to support consistent and safe clinical operation across services. It was developed by the MRI-Linac QA sub-group of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linac Working Group using an evidence-informed, consensus-based approach. Key international standards, task group reports, vendor documentation, and peer-reviewed literature relevant to the MRI-Linac were reviewed. Candidate QA tests were mapped to clinical risks and system functions, then organized into commissioning and routine QA domains with suggested cadence. Recommendations were refined through iterative working group review, with emphasis on implementation and auditability. The resulting commissioning recommendations are grouped into domains addressing key performance and safety areas for MRI-Linacs. Additionally, a minimum test set is proposed with suggested frequencies and tolerances where supported by evidence. Adoption of this guideline supports harmonized MRI-Linac QA practice, improved reproducibility across sites, and enhanced patient safety. The framework is designed to be implementable across platforms and evolve as MRI-guided radiotherapy workflows, vendor capabilities, and the evidence matures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853466What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.