Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42853459›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Palliative care development as a solution to mitigate the human crisis of cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a theory of change approach.

Seema Rajesh Rao, Shrikant Atreya, Mebin Mathew, Arathi P Rao, Catherine Walshe, Nancy Preston, Srinagesh Simha, Richard Sullivan, William E Rosa, Gary Rodin and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Seema Rajesh RaoManipal Hospice and Respite Centre, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8278-3640
Shrikant AtreyaDepartment of Palliative Care and Psycho-Oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India.
Mebin MathewDepartment of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Arathi P RaoDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Catherine WalsheDepartment of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Nancy PrestonDepartment of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Srinagesh SimhaBangalore Hospital Trust - Karunashraya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Richard SullivanInstitute of Cancer Policy, Centre for Conflict & Health Research, King's College London, London, UK.
William E RosaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York City, NY, USA.
Gary RodinDivision of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Naveen SalinsDepartment of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. naveen.salins@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden of cancer is rising in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where social determinants, limited access to treatment, and inadequate palliative care amplify suffering. With most unmet palliative care needs concentrated in LMICs, strengthening palliative care in these settings is a moral and health systems imperative. This study aimed to develop a roadmap for palliative care development in LMICs.

methodsA theory of change framework was used to explore palliative care development in LMICs as it enabled mapping of complex, interacting elements and their impact on meaningful change. Stakeholders were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling via the research team's professional networks, and included physicians, nurses, public health experts, and community participants. Eight virtual workshops addressed key elements of the theory of change framework: impact, outcomes, preconditions, interventions, and assumptions. Data from workshop transcripts, online chats, and facilitator meetings were analysed iteratively using consensus-driven theory-informed approach to map the causal pathway.

resultsTwenty-one stakeholders from three continents participated in eight facilitated workshops. Stakeholders emphasised integration of palliative care into health systems as central to its development and essential for mitigating cancer-related suffering. The desired outcome was comprehensive, sustainable, and culturally relevant palliative care. Fourteen preconditions, 21 interventions, and 12 assumptions were identified and mapped onto the causal pathway.

conclusionThe theory of change approach facilitated the creation of contextually grounded stakeholder-informed roadmap for palliative care development in LMICs, achievable through integration within existing health systems. Future efforts should concentrate on testing the implementation, feasibility and impact of this roadmap across diverse LMICs.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPalliative CareDeveloping CountriesHumansResource-Limited SettingsHealth system integrationLower-middle-income countriesPalliative care developmentSystems transformationTheory of change

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.