ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Three-dimensional CT evaluation of anatomical constraints during posterior lip drilling in the retrosigmoid approach to the internal auditory canal.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a CT-based three-dimensional morphometric framework for evaluating the depth and orientation of posterior lip drilling during the retrosigmoid approach.
methodsOne hundred normal temporal bones from 50 adults were reconstructed from high-resolution CT. Five surgically relevant landmarks were identified at the endolymphatic sac-duct junction, posterior internal auditory canal (IAC) porus, common crus, lateral IAC fundus, and Bill's bar. Six linear distances and four angular relationships were measured to characterise the drilling corridor relative to the IAC, labyrinth, and endolymphatic sac/duct system. Associations with sex, age, and laterality were explored using a significance threshold of p < 0.01.
resultsThe distance from the posterior IAC porus to the fundus-related landmark was 10.4 ± 1.9 mm, and that from the common crus to the fundus-related landmark was 5.8 ± 1.2 mm. Bill's bar lay 0.9 ± 0.9 mm from the reference plane. The drilling-corridor angle relative to the posterior IAC was 46.1 ± 9.0°. The angle between the endolymphatic sac-common crus axis and the lateral semicircular canal plane was 30.7 ± 15.3° and showed the greatest variability. No significant sex-related or left-right differences were identified. Age showed significant negative correlations with two linear measurements.
conclusionCT-based three-dimensional assessment demonstrated patient-specific variation in drilling orientation as well as depth. This framework may support selective preoperative anatomical planning, but pathological and intraoperative validation is required before these measurements can be considered operative limits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853445What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.