ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Handheld lung ultrasound for assessing cystic fibrosis lung disease in children: a diaphragm-ıntegrated scoring approach.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a radiation-free imaging modality with potential value for monitoring cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. However, data on handheld LUS performed by pediatric pulmonologists, as well as the integration of diaphragmatic assessment into LUS scoring, remain limited. This prospective cross-sectional study included clinically stable children with CF (cwCF). LUS was performed independently by a pediatric radiologist using a conventional ultrasound device and by a pediatric pulmonologist using a handheld device. Three LUS scores were evaluated: radiologist-assessed LUS score(LUS-PR), pulmonologist-assessed handheld LUS score(LUS-PP), and diaphragm-integrated LUS score(LUS-DM). Correlations with Modified Chrispin-Norman chest radiography(CXR) scores, spirometry, and clinical variables were analyzed. 35 cwCF were included; the mean age was 7.2 ± 4.8 years, and 22 patients (62.9%) were female. The mean CXR, LUS-PR, LUS-PP, and LUS-DM scores were 3.00 ± 3.31, 2.37 ± 1.93, 2.00 ± 1.82, and 2.77 ± 1.93, respectively. CXR score correlated with LUS-PR (r = 0.55, p < 0.001), LUS-PP (r = 0.49,p = 0.003), and LUS-DM (r = 0.50, p = 0.002). LUS-PR and LUS-PP were strongly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.001), with excellent interobserver agreement (ICC = 0.91). FVC z-score correlated with both LUS-PP (r = - 0.49, p = 0.046) and LUS-DM (r = - 0.54,p = 0.025), while FEV₁ z-score correlated significantly with LUS-DM (r = - 0.53,p = 0.030). Chronic airway infection was associated with LUS-DM (r = 0.38, p = 0.024), but not with LUS-PP.
conclusionHandheld LUS performed by a pediatric pulmonologist showed excellent agreement with radiologist-assessed LUS and correlated with radiographic disease severity in clinically stable children with CF. The diaphragm-integrated LUS-DM score was feasible, and exploratory analyses showed associations with spirometric z-scores and chronic airway infection, supporting further validation of diaphragm-integrated handheld LUS for monitoring cwCF. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Children with cystic fibrosis require repeated monitoring of structural lung disease throughout follow-up. • Lung ultrasound is a radiation-free bedside imaging tool that may reflect lung involvement in pediatric cystic fibrosis. WHAT IS NEW: • Handheld LUS by a pediatric pulmonologist showed excellent agreement with radiologist-assessed LUS and correlated with CXR severity. • Diaphragm-integrated LUS was feasible and exploratory analyses showed associations with spirometric z-scores and chronic airway infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.