ArticleBehavior research methods2026
C-VLT: A reliable Chinese Vocabulary Levels Test for primary and secondary school learners.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study developed the first Chinese Vocabulary Levels Test (C-VLT) designed for native Chinese learners in Grades 1 through 9, utilizing a developmental vocabulary list. The C-VLT comprises four subtests, each matched to different grade levels. Using probability proportional to size sampling, we selected 16 schools from four counties, with a total of 10,460 students participating in the test. Analyses combining classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) showed that the test exhibited reasonable difficulty and discrimination, and no items showed differential item functioning effects, indicating high item quality and satisfactory test fairness. Additionally, all four subtests demonstrated high CTT reliability, and the IRT information curves and standard errors indicated good measurement precision for most students. Furthermore, evidence based on test content, internal structure, and theoretically expected relations to educational stage and word frequency supported the intended interpretation of C-VLT scores as indicators of recognition-based receptive Chinese vocabulary knowledge and stage-based vocabulary mastery. Item difficulty also generally increased as word frequency decreased and educational stage increased. Taken together, the C-VLT provides reliable and interpretable scores for assessing learners' receptive Chinese vocabulary knowledge across educational stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.