Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42853304›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026

Recent Evidence on Factors and Potential Interventions Affecting Patient Sleep in Inpatient and Hospital Settings.

John Nordstrand, Natalia Vincens, Michael G Smith

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John NordstrandSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Natalia VincensSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-9573
Michael G SmithSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. michael.smith@amm.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-9625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSleep is a critical but frequently disrupted part of hospital care, affecting patient recovery, length of stay, and physical and mental health. This review examines recent evidence (2022-2026) on why inpatient sleep is disrupted and how interventions can mitigate disturbance across different patient groups and hospital settings. RECENT

findingsFindings span five domains: environmental factors such as noise and light, hospital infrastructure and room configuration, patient-related factors including pain and anxiety, care routines, and interventions. Recent high-quality trials and meta-analyses increasingly support nonpharmacological strategies - including environmental modification, care-routine restructuring, and sensory therapies - while evidence for pharmacological agents such as melatonin remains weak outside specific contexts. This review highlights the multifactorial nature of sleep disruption in hospital settings. Prioritizing patient sleep through evidence-based, sustainable strategies can support faster recovery, reduce complications, and improve overall care quality, yet poor sleep remains pervasive. Current evidence supports system-level interventions (workflow restructuring, environmental redesign) and low-cost measures (earplugs, sleep masks, physical therapy) to improve sleep related outcomes including delirium, pain, and length of stay.

Indexed as

InpatientsSleepSleep Wake DisordersHumansDeliriumHospital environmentInpatient sleepIntensive care unitNon-pharmacological interventionsSleep disruption

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.