ArticleSurgery today2026
Coronary bypass outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia are significantly worse than in patients with non-critical lower extremity arterial disease.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) is a risk factor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); however, the impact of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), its most advanced stage, remains unclear. We evaluated early and long-term outcomes of CABG in CLTI.
methodWe retrospectively analyzed 334 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2014 and 2024. Patients were stratified into three groups: CLTI (n = 22), non-CLTI LEAD (n = 41), and non-LEAD (n = 271). The primary endpoint was long-term survival; the secondary endpoints were 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
resultsThe CLTI group had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (90.9%) and hemodialysis (86.4%) (p < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality was similar (9.1%, 2.4%, and 5.5%; p = 0.52), whereas five-year survival was significantly lower in the CLTI group (39.8% vs. 86.2% and 90.8%; p < 0.01). A Cox analysis showed that age, hemodialysis, and acute myocardial infarction were independent predictors of 5-year survival.
conclusionsCLTI predicts poor long-term survival because of comorbidities. In this high-risk population, individualized strategies balancing the extent of coronary revascularization against operative risk may achieve acceptable early outcomes, although the safety of incomplete/functional revascularization requires confirmation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853290What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.