ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
Selecting the myopic target for an enhanced monofocal IOL in highly myopic eyes: -2.0 D versus - 3.0 D.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the optimal myopic target refraction for enhanced monofocal IOL implantation in highly myopic cataract patients.
methodsA retrospective comparative study was conducted in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, China. Cataract patients with axial length (AL) ≥ 26 mm who underwent phacoemulsification with enhanced monofocal IOL implantation were included. Participants were divided into 2 groups by target refraction: Group 1 (-2 diopters [D]) and Group 2 (-3 D). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), near (UNVA) visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), objective visual quality, and subjective satisfaction were evaluated 3 months postoperatively. Subgroup analyses were performed for 26 mm ≤ AL < 28 mm and AL ≥ 28 mm.
resultsA total of 94 eyes of 94 patients were analyzed. Group 1 showed superior UDVA (0.48 vs. 0.72 logMAR, P < .001), UIVA at 80 cm (0.17 vs. 0.32 logMAR, P < .001) and 60 cm (0.13 vs. 0.23 logMAR, P = .003), and higher spectacle independence at far distance (20.00% vs. 2.04%, P = .011) than Group 2. UNVA at 40 cm, CDVA, and other outcomes were similar between groups (all P > .05). Similar trends were observed across AL subgroups.
conclusionAn enhanced monofocal IOL targeted at -2.0 D provided superior UDVA and UIVA while maintaining comparable UNVA in highly myopic eyes. We recommend a target refraction of -2.0 D for eyes with AL < 28 mm, while a personalized approach is advised for eyes with AL ≥ 28 mm or for patients with shorter habitual reading distances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.