ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Pain Enhances the Auditory P2 but Attenuates Mismatch Response and P3a.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAuditory input is known to modulate the perception of pain, yet the reciprocal influence, how pain affects auditory processing, remains less well understood. We investigated how continuous tonic pain dynamically alters auditory cortical responses in humans.
methodsUsing a three-stimulus auditory oddball paradigm combined with EEG, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants experienced thermal stimulation under three conditions: baseline, non-painful warmth, and pain. We examined multiple stages of auditory processing, including early sensory encoding (N1, P2), automatic deviance detection (MMN), and attentional reorienting (P3a).
resultsTonic pain modulated auditory ERPs in a stage- and component-specific manner. Compared to baseline and warm conditions, pain was associated with enhanced P2 responses to distractors and reduced MMN and P3a amplitudes, although no statistically significant differences in behavioural performance were observed. This pattern suggests enhanced early salience detection alongside reduced pre-attentive deviance detection and involuntary attentional shifts under pain. The warm condition selectively modulated N1 amplitude, indicating that some effects may be related to the affective and attentional demands of pain rather than somatosensory stimulation per se.
conclusionsContinuous tonic pain is associated with selective modulation of auditory processing, characterized by enhanced early sensory responsiveness and reduced higher-order attentional engagement. This biphasic neural pattern, observed in the absence of measurable behavioural differences, is consistent with predictive coding and salience network accounts of pain-attention interactions and highlights the sensitivity of ERPs for detecting pain-related neural reweighting. The absence of statistically significant behavioural effects should be interpreted with caution and may reflect relatively subtle or context-dependent influences of pain under the present task conditions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study is among the first to systematically examine how experimentally induced tonic pain modulates distinct stages of auditory processing in healthy individuals using high-resolution ERPs, with a task design and hypothesis framework capable of teasing apart the cognitive mechanisms underlying these changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853237What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.