Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42853117›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2026

Evaluation, Management, and Return-To-Sport Guidelines for Cervical Spine Injuries in Athletes: A Narrative Review.

Firas Batrash, Nicolas L Carayannopoulos, Puru Sadh, Yasmeen Saeed, Michael J Farias, Joseph E Nassar, Jinseong Kim, Eren O Kuris, Stephen E Marcaccio, Nicholas Lemme and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Firas BatrashDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Nicolas L CarayannopoulosDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Puru SadhDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Yasmeen SaeedDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Michael J FariasDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Joseph E NassarDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Jinseong KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Eren O KurisDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Stephen E MarcaccioDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Nicholas LemmeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Brett OwensDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Bryce A BasquesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7745-8701
Alan H DanielsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9597-4139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignNarrative review.ObjectivesTo synthesize current evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, classification, evaluation, and imaging of cervical spine injuries (CSI) in athletes and propose a practical framework for return-to-sport (RTS) decision-making.MethodsA review of the most recent and relevant published studies and consensus statements was performed, focusing on athletic cervical spine pathology. Key domains included on-field assessment, imaging modalities, clinical clearance criteria, and sport-specific risk considerations. All literature published in reputable journals, preferably available through well-regarded databases such as Scopus and PubMed, was eligible for inclusion, with preference given to the most recent publications related to any given topic.ResultsThe reviewed literature supports that RTS across CSI types requires resolution of symptoms, normal neurologic examination, restoration of painless cervical range of motion and strength, and radiographic evidence of healing or stability. MRI is consistently recommended for identifying high-risk features such as canal stenosis, cord signal change, or ligamentous disruption. Sport-specific risk stratification is supported by data showing higher reinjury rates in collision sports. Evidence remains heterogeneous, with substantial variation in specialist recommendations.ConclusionsSafe RTS after CSI requires comprehensive clinical and imaging assessment, recognition of sport-specific risks, and shared decision-making to prioritize athlete safety while avoiding unnecessary restrictions.

Indexed as

Cervical Spinemanagementnarrative reviewReturn to sport

Identifiers

PMID42853117
PMCPMC13652988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.