ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2026
Meaningful digital mobility outcomes for people with Parkinson's disease: Insights grounded in diverse lived experience.
Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundDigital mobility outcomes (DMOs) have been cited as potential clinical endpoints for trials in Parkinson's disease (PD). Current evidence from the Mobilise-D consortium suggests that selected DMOs are technically valid, with emerging research on their clinical validity. However, regulatory qualification of DMOs requires additional evidence of their meaningfulness to people with PD.ObjectiveTo identify meaningful DMOs by understanding how mobility symptoms impact aspects of health that matter to people with PD.MethodsPurposive sampling recruited a diverse sample of people with PD to participate in semi-structured interviews. Content analysis identified frequent and bothersome mobility symptoms and their impacts on meaningful aspects of health. Twelve experts mapped meaningful symptoms to relevant DMOs through a nominal group consensus.ResultsSeventy-two people with PD participated, inclusive of under-served groups: ethnic minorities (14%) or LGBTQIA + backgrounds (14%), in older age (3%) or with young-onset PD (13%), living rurally (31%) or in a deprived area (19%). Shuffling gait, bradykinesia and balance issues were the most frequent symptoms, and the most bothersome and impactful on meaningful aspects of health (i.e., activities of daily living, life-space mobility, emotional wellbeing) among participants who experienced them. Less frequent, but still highly bothersome and impactful symptoms included freezing of gait, fatigue and weakness. Expert consensus suggested that walking speed, stride length and turn duration were the most relevant DMOs to reflect these meaningful symptoms.ConclusionFindings offer an inclusive, meaningful framework for digital assessment of mobility in PD, grounded in lived experience and consistent with regulatory guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.