ArticleSICOT-J2026
Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the CORI
Article in SICOT-J, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is technically demanding due to altered anatomy, asymmetric bone loss, and soft-tissue imbalance, often necessitating stems or augments. Robotic-assisted TKA may enhance the accuracy of bone resection and ligament balancing, potentially facilitating bone preservation in this complex setting. This article describes a step-by-step surgical technique for imageless robotic-assisted conversion of a failed medial UKA to TKA using the CORI™ system in a case of early aseptic loosening. The workflow is based on intraoperative surface mapping and dynamic kinematic assessment. The knee is initially registered as a native joint to capture global alignment and soft-tissue behavior, followed by additional reference point acquisition after implant removal to accurately quantify bone loss. This strategy enables patient-specific planning of femoral and tibial resections, real-time adjustment of component positioning, and controlled gap balancing throughout the range of motion. The principal innovation of this technique is the dual-stage imageless robotic workflow, combining pre-explant native kinematic registration with post-explant defect mapping and iterative re-planning. In the presented case, conversion was successfully achieved without the use of stems or augments. Imageless robotic-assisted UKA-to-TKA conversion using this technique appears feasible and reproducible. By combining native kinematic mapping with quantitative defect assessment, this workflow may facilitate accurate implant positioning, controlled gap balancing, and bone-preserving reconstruction in selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42852804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.