Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42852694›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2026

Are Increases in Purchasing Alcohol-Free and Low-Alcohol Drinks Associated With Attempts to Cut Down on Alcohol Consumption in England? A Time Series Analysis.

Abigail K Stevely, Inge Kersbergen, Jamie Brown, Ellen McGrane, Sarah Jackson, Luke B Wilson, John Holmes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abigail K StevelySheffield Addictions Research Group, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-5245
Inge KersbergenDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-8963
Jamie BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-5428
Ellen McGraneSheffield Addictions Research Group, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-3462
Sarah JacksonDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5658-6168
Luke B WilsonSheffield Addictions Research Group, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-5729
John HolmesSheffield Addictions Research Group, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-2151

Funding

Cancer Research UK PRCRPG-Nov21\100002National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR135310School for Public Health Research NIHR204000UK Prevention Reserach Partnership MR/S037519/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlcohol-free and low-alcohol products (≤ 1.2% ABV; no/lo products) are a growing market in high-income countries, including Great Britain. These products may support people in reducing alcohol consumption, but their impact on public health is unclear. To address this gap, we analysed whether changes over time in the prevalence of households purchasing no/lo products were associated with at-risk drinkers reporting: (i) high motivation to cut down; (ii) cut down attempts; (iii) serious cut down attempts; and (iv) using no/lo products during attempts.

methodsWe used time series analysis of continuous household purchasing panel data and monthly cross-sectional survey data from adults in England (2018-2023). The primary exposure was household prevalence of purchasing no/lo products. Outcomes focused on cut down attempts in the last 12 months amongst at-risk drinkers, defined as scoring ≥ 5 on the consumption questions or ≥ 8 on all questions of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

resultsChanges in household no/lo purchasing were not significantly associated with population-level prevalence of high motivation to cut down (B: -0.001 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI -0.013 to 0.011), current or past 12-month attempts (B: -0.012 pp; 95% CI -0.025 to 0.000), most recent attempt being reported as serious (B: 0.004 pp; 95% CI -0.016 to 0.023) or use of no/lo during the most recent attempt (B: 0.012 pp; 95% CI -0.023 to 0.046). These narrow confidence intervals do not include clinically significant effect sizes. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsFrom 2018 to 2023, increases in the population-level prevalence of no/lo purchasing in England were not significantly associated with changes in the prevalence of cut down attempts amongst at-risk drinkers.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesCommerceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPrevalencealcohol drinkingharmful drinkingpurchasingtime series analysiszero‐alcohol

Identifiers

PMID42852694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.