Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42852687›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026

A Qualitative Study of Parental Decision-Making Following a Prenatal Diagnosis of Turner Syndrome: "How Serious Is This?"

Inger Lily Hjuler Dorf, Stina Lou, Christine Manich Bech Baggesgaard, Rune W Naeraa, Casper P Hagen, Anne Skakkebæk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inger Lily Hjuler DorfDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-9233
Stina LouDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6177-5780
Christine Manich Bech BaggesgaardDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-6600
Rune W NaeraaDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8379-4092
Casper P HagenDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0250-8049
Anne SkakkebækDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-4901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prenatal diagnosis of Turner syndrome (TS) presents expectant parents with complex and emotionally demanding decisions under conditions of uncertainty. However, there is limited insight into how parents interpret and integrate medical information, personal experiences, and values during this process. This qualitative study explores how parents who chose to continue a pregnancy following a prenatal TS diagnosis experienced and navigated decision-making. The study was conducted within the Danish healthcare system between September 2024 and October 2025. During this period, we conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with 19 parents of girls diagnosed prenatally with TS (seven joint interviews with both parents and five interviews with the mother only). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Across interviews, parents repeatedly returned to the question, "How serious is this?", and our analysis showed that decision-making unfolded as a dynamic, evolving process rather than a single point of choice. This process was captured through five interrelated themes: The crisis of diagnosis; What parents bring into decision-making; Contrasting images of Turner syndrome; What kind of life is possible?; and The turning point. These themes illustrate how assessments of seriousness were shaped through an interplay of prior experiences, emerging attachment to the fetus, ultrasound findings, counseling encounters, and social responses. Over time, parents developed a more coherent understanding of the diagnosis, culminating in the decision to continue the pregnancy. In this way, decision-making following a prenatal TS diagnosis extended beyond the evaluation of medical information and involved substantial interpretative and emotional work. Clinical encounters were most meaningful when information was contextualized and aligned with parents' concerns about everyday life and future possibilities. These findings reinforce the importance of prenatal counseling that integrates medical information with support for the interpretative and emotional work through which parents make sense of the diagnosis and navigate uncertainty.

Indexed as

Decision MakingParentsPrenatal DiagnosisTurner SyndromeAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative Researchgenetic counselingparental decisionsprenatal diagnosticsqualitative researchtermination of pregnancyturner syndrome

Identifiers

PMID42852687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.