ArticleJournal of global health2026
Intergenerational educational mobility and intrinsic capacity in later life: a harmonised analysis of individuals from five countries.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization's intrinsic capacity (IC) framework shifts focus from disease to functional ageing. Despite education's role in health, the impact of intergenerational educational mobility (IEM) on IC trajectories remains understudied. We aimed to examine the cross-national association between IEM and IC, its effect on biological ageing rates, and underlying mechanisms. Methods: We analysed harmonised longitudinal data from five nationally representative cohorts: China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, Health and Retirement Study (USA), Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing, and Mexican Health and Aging Study, including 495,028 observations from 100,362 individuals aged ≥50. We standardised IC as a composite of cognition, locomotion, vitality, sensory, and psychological domains. We used a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis, growth curve modelling, and the Karlson-Holm-Breen mediation method to assess associations, trajectories, and pathways via wealth, behaviours, and chronic conditions. Results: Upward IEM was robustly linked to higher IC (pooled β = 0.25; 95% confidence interval = 0.24, 0.26; P < 0.001). Linear mixed-effects models showed distinct intra-individual ageing patterns: upward mobility significantly decelerated the rate of IC decline ('delayed ageing') in China, Europe, South Korea, and Mexico. Conversely, a 'parallel ageing' pattern emerged in the USA, where mobility massively elevated baseline capacity but did not alter the slope of age-related decline. Conclusions: The IEM confers consistent health advantages across countries, but the magnitude and trajectory of these benefits are context-dependent. The unique 'US exception' of parallel ageing suggests that while mobility elevates early-life health capital, systemic environmental or healthcare factors may equalise subsequent late-life decline. Enhancing mobility remains a critical global strategy for healthy longevity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42852608What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.