ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice2026
Longitudinal Cognitive Function in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy-A Review of the Evidence for Progression.
Review in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progressive supranuclear palsy is a rare and rapidly progressive neurodegenerative syndrome. Clinical manifestations are heterogeneous and include Parkinsonism, postural instability, oculomotor dysfunction and cognitive impairment, with 80% of patients progressing to dementia within 3 years. Cognitive impairment is consistently associated with poorer outcomes independent of motor function, including increased mortality, morbidity, caregiver burden and healthcare utilization. The prototypic cognitive phenotype of PSP demonstrates marked deficits in executive functions and slowed processing speed accompanied by neuropsychiatric symptoms. Cross-sectionally, these deficits are readily detected across a range of cognitive screening tools and more comprehensive neuropsychological batteries. Brief bedside assessments, such as the Frontal Assessment Battery, are highly effective at differentiating PSP from idiopathic Parkinson's disease soon after motor symptom onset. However, as the field increasingly moves toward disease-modifying trials that include cognitive outcome measures the purpose of cognitive assessment shifts; from supporting a clinical diagnosis, to measuring progression thereafter. The sensitivity to change of commonly used cognitive outcome measures is therefore a priority. In this narrative review we evaluate longitudinal cognitive assessment in PSP. We specifically focus on the unique challenges of cognitive assessment in this patient group and propose measurement priorities for future development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42852583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.