ArticleBone & joint research2026
Is it safe to use surgical instruments with debris from a previous surgery after sterilization?
Article in Bone & joint research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The presence of biological debris on surgical instruments after reprocessing poses potential risks of infection in orthopaedic surgery. While autoclave sterilization is the standard method, its effectiveness in eliminating microbial contamination from residual bone, cement, and fatty tissue remains insufficiently studied. The primary objective was to study in vitro the sterility of retained cement, bone, and fat tissue debris on surgical instruments after autoclave sterilization. The secondary objective was to compare, based on colony-forming units (CFU), which material exhibits greater biofilm formation. Methods: An in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the sterility of retained biological debris on surgical instruments after autoclave sterilization. The autoclave sterilization procedure was performed at 1 atmosphere pressure (121°C) for 20 minutes. A total of 350 repetitions were performed, including five instruments used as sample specimens (drill bit, cannulated flexible reamer, femoral broach, cannulated screwdriver, and wire passer), with 70 repetitions per specimen. CFU/mL were counted and biofilm morphology was assessed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: After autoclave sterilization, no positive cultures were detected in any of the 350 repetitions (0%, 95% CI 0 to 5; n = 0), demonstrating complete absence of viable microorganisms. Due to the lack of microbial recovery, no statistical comparisons between instrument types were performed. We did not find any structural deformity in the mixed biofilms on bone, cement, and stainless steel as observed by SEM. Conclusion: Autoclave sterilization was effective in eliminating microorganisms from surgical instruments with retained biological debris. Although no apparent structural deformities of microorganisms were observed by SEM in the mixed biofilms, no bacterial growth was detected after sterilization, supporting the microbiological effectiveness of autoclave sterilization even in the presence of retained biological debris. These findings provide microbiological evidence supporting current sterilization practices, and highlight the need for further studies evaluating alternative sterilization methods such as ethylene oxide or plasma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.