ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2026
Distinct biological and biomechanical features in jaw and knee cartilage contribute to their degenerative susceptibility.
Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and knee joint are both prone to degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA); however, TMJ-OA generally manifests earlier than knee OA, with underlying mechanisms largely unknown. In this study, we explored potential explanations through comprehensive biological and biomechanical analyses in mice. Structurally, the mandibular condylar cartilage (MCC) exhibits prominent differences from tibial articular cartilage (AC) at occlusion establishment, evidenced by distinct extracellular matrix organization and enriched transcription factor expression toward the posterior TMJ. Both jaw and knee cartilage house progenitor-like, slow-cycling cells at the cartilage surface, but these cells are depleted more rapidly in the MCC, associated with faster tissue turnover and cellular replenishment. Biomechanically, the MCC exhibits a lower elastic modulus (EIT) than the tibial AC. This biomechanical feature is correlated with its unique extracellular matrix composition to support the force-bearing jaw movement at the anterior TMJ, while providing cushioning and compliance to protect a putative stem/progenitor cell niche at the posterior TMJ. Together, these findings highlight fundamental biological and biomechanical distinctions between jaw and knee cartilage that may underlie their different susceptibility to degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42852536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.