ArticleCHEST critical care2026
Impact of Balanced Crystalloids vs Saline by Resuscitation Strategy in Sepsis: A Secondary Analysis of the Crystalloid Liberal or Vasopressor Early Resuscitation in Sepsis Trial.
Article in CHEST critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal crystalloid for sepsis resuscitation and whether choice should differ under restrictive vs liberal strategy remains uncertain. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do outcomes differ by fluid type within liberal vs restrictive resuscitation strategies? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of the Crystalloid Liberal or Vasopressor Early Resuscitation in Sepsis study. Patients were categorized by the predominant crystalloid in the first 24 hours (> 80%; balanced crystalloids [BCs], normal saline [NS], or mixed) and were stratified by randomized resuscitation strategy (liberal vs restrictive). The primary outcome was death before discharge by day 90. Secondary outcomes included new renal replacement therapy (RRT), organ support-free days, and adverse events. Analysis used inverse probability weighting with covariate balancing and tested a fluid-type by strategy interaction.
resultsAmong 1,563 patients, 423 patients (27%) received BCs, 226 patients (15%) received NS, and 914 patients (58%) receiving mixed fluids. The association of fluid type with mortality varied by strategy (χ
interpretationOutcomes differed by fluid type and resuscitation strategy. In the liberal arm, BCs were associated with lower mortality than NS or mixed fluids; this was not seen with a restrictive strategy. Early sepsis resuscitation should consider both fluid composition and strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.