ArticleEarly childhood research quarterly
How you read the text matters: Caregiver oral reading prosody during shared reading relates to preschoolers' language skills.
Article in Early childhood research quarterly. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acoustic features of child directed speech (CDS) in caregiver-child conversational interactions are known to capture young children's attention to language input and facilitate language learning. Emerging evidence suggests that caregivers' use of CDS-like features when reading to their child, known as caregiver oral reading prosody, plays an important role in supporting preschoolers' storybook comprehension. Do associations between caregiver oral reading prosody and preschoolers' language extend beyond real-time listening comprehension to broader language skills? Forty-one caregivers read a children's book to their child (ages: 4-5 years) as they normally would at home. The caregivers' oral reading prosody (i.e., intonation and timing features) was examined in relation to children's receptive vocabulary and core language skills. Moderated mediation models then investigated possible impacts of caregivers' broader reading skills and shared reading time on these associations. Caregiver intonation range positively related to child vocabulary, and caregiver inappropriate (i.e., ungrammatical) pausing negatively related to child core language skills. Mediation models revealed that caregivers' broader reading skills indirectly related to child language through oral reading prosody measures. Notably, the indirect effect linking caregiver reading skills to child vocabulary via caregiver intonation range was moderated by shared reading time, with the strongest effects among dyads reporting less shared reading engagement. Findings illuminate caregiver oral reading prosody as one factor linking caregiver reading skills to child language, with particular relevance among families of caregivers with reading difficulties and for those with limited shared reading opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.