Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42852374›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Comparative evaluation of culture systems for shoot propagation and phytochemical characteristics in pokeweed (

Worasitikulya Taratima, Wipa Yaowachai, Attachai Trunjaruen, Pitakpong Maneerattanarungroj, Prathan Luecha

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Worasitikulya TaratimaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Wipa YaowachaiQueen Sirikit Botanic Garden, Botanical Garden Organization, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Attachai TrunjaruenDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Chon Buri, Thailand.
Pitakpong ManeerattanarungrojFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Prathan LuechaDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: Nodal explants were cultured on solid and liquid media or in a TIS bioreactor. Six TIS regimes combining 5 or 10 min immersion durations with 1, 2, or 3 immersions per day were evaluated. Growth, callus formation, biomass, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity were determined. Multivariate analyses were used to characterize treatment responses. Results: All treatments showed 100% explant survival and response. Liquid culture produced the weakest shoot and leaf development, whereas TIS generally supported greater shoot growth. T6 (10 min, three immersions/day) produced the highest shoot length (5.69 ± 0.83 cm), leaf length (4.79 ± 0.55 cm), and dry weight (0.12 ± 0.03 g). T5 produced the highest TPC (14.82 ± 0.10 mg gallic acid equivalents per gram (GAE/g) extract), solid culture the highest TFC (31.25 ± 0.94 mg quercetin equivalents per gram (QE/g) extract), and T1 the strongest DPPH radical-scavenging activity (IC Conclusion: Culture system and immersion regime differentially influenced the growth and phytochemical characteristics of

Indexed as

PhytochemicalsPhytolacca americanaPlant ShootsTissue Culture TechniquesBiphenyl CompoundsFlavonoidsPhenolsPlant LeavesBiphenyl CompoundsFlavonoidsPhenolsPhytochemicalsAntioxidant activityBioreactorOrganogenesisPhenolicsPokeweedTemporary immersion system

Identifiers

PMID42852374
PMCPMC13648216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.