Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42852366›Full record

ReviewBJR artificial intelligence2026

Casting wider than U-Nets: evaluating the role of novel machine learning applications in radiation therapy.

Osama Omrani, Sayan Biswas, Rajesh Jena

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Osama OmraniDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-0240
Sayan BiswasDepartment of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700032, India.
Rajesh JenaDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation oncology has proven an early adopter of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) owing to its image-centered workflow and data richness. DL auto-segmentation of normal structures is already guideline-endorsed, with self-configuring nnU-Net delivering near-state-of-the-art accuracy and widely adopted. In this review, we explore advances in ML algorithms in processing and interpreting imaging-based data beyond normal tissue auto-segmentation with applications upstream and downstream of this task, highlighting training data volume and best-in-class architectures. Applications discussed range from diagnostics with "virtual biopsies" and automated staging to radiotherapy planning with gross tumor volume and clinical target volume (CTV) prediction. We illustrate the developments of cutting-edge transformer-based designs and foundation models, but also the important role of lightweight, task-specific classical ML models. Data scarcity may be eased by developments in few-shot learning (FSL) and transfer learning strategies. We also consider how end-to-end automated CTV delineation may require an agentic approach to mimic the reasoning of a radiation oncologist, capable of processing multi-modal data with clinical context. Together, these advancements point toward a future where ML will become increasingly central to radiation oncology practice. However, implementation of these tools beyond normal tissue auto-segmentation remains limited and will require careful assessment and validation in the clinic.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningimage processingmachine learningprecision healthcareradiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID42852366
PMCPMC13648204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.