ArticlePeerJ2026
Multifocal electroretinography assessment of retinal responses to myopic defocus lenses.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the short-term retinal electrical responses elicited by defocus segment lenses in emmetropic eyes using multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Materials & Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study enrolled 14 young, healthy emmetropic participants aged 18 to 22 years with no ocular or systemic diseases. Comprehensive eye examinations were conducted, and mfERG recordings were obtained using six different condition scenarios. Retinal responses were analyzed across hexagon ring groupings defined by angular extent (Ring 1: 2.5°, Ring 2: 7.5°, Ring 3: 14°, Ring 4: 22°, Ring 5: 30°). Statistical analysis was performed to compare retinal responses across different lens types and retinal regions. Results: No significant differences in retinal electrical responses were detected across the six lens conditions for negative (N1) latency (ms), positive (P1) latency (ms), or P1 amplitude (nV/deg Conclusion: The tested defocus segment lens designs did not produce statistically detectable alterations in first order mfERG parameters in structurally intact emmetropic eyes under brief exposure. Although the analytical framework demonstrated sufficient sensitivity to identify medium to large electrophysiological effects, the current design may lack resolution for subtle retinal adaptations. Future investigations incorporating larger cohorts, prolonged optical exposure, and nonlinear analytical techniques in ametropic populations will be necessary to determine whether clinically relevant myopia control mechanisms correspond to measurable electrophysiological modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.