Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42852356›Full record

ReviewCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2026

Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction and Management of Stroke Rehabilitation.

Weihua Song, Shuai Si, Yinghui Wang, Hong Chang, Xiaoying Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weihua SongDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Shuai SiSchool of Medical Technology, Zhengzhou Academy of Intelligent Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Yinghui WangLuohe Orthopedic Hospital, Luohe 462001, China.
Hong ChangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Xiaoying TangSchool of Medical Technology, Zhengzhou Academy of Intelligent Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is being studied across the stroke care pathway, but evidence from acute diagnosis, early prognosis, rehabilitation-outcome prediction, and long-term management is often discussed without clearly separating these clinical tasks. This structured narrative review adds an integrated framework that maps each application to its decision point, relevance to rehabilitation, validation level, and readiness for clinical use. Unlike previous technology-centered reviews, it explicitly separates acute prognostic evidence from rehabilitation-specific evidence and distinguishes technical performance from transportability, clinical impact, and rehabilitation benefit. Acute imaging and prognostic models may provide baseline information for later rehabilitation planning, but their diagnostic or prognostic performance does not establish rehabilitation efficacy. Most rehabilitation models and robotic, virtual-reality, brain-computer interface, wearable, and home-monitoring applications remain supported mainly by internal validation or early exploratory studies. Small or selected datasets, limited external and prospective validation, uncertain workflow effects, and sparse patient-centered outcomes continue to constrain clinical interpretation.

Identifiers

PMID42852356
PMCPMC13648198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.