ArticleACS omega2026
Hydroxyethylcellulose- and Chitosan-Modified 3D-Printed Carbon Electrodes for Indole-3-Acetic Acid and Salicylic Acid Determination.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study describes the development of a 3D-printed carbon black (3D-CB) electrode modified with hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) and chitosan (CH) layers, applied to the simultaneous quantification of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and salicylic acid (SA) in plant samples. Measurements were performed by square-wave voltammetry (SWV) under optimized conditions, enabling rapid and resolved detection of phytohormones. The method exhibited linear responses for both analytes, with correlation coefficients (r) of 0.999. Limits of detection (LOD) were 0.446 μM for IAA and 0.335 μM for SA. Good precision was obtained, with RSD values for both intraday and interday analyses not exceeding 4.70%. The applicability of the method was evaluated in real plant samples, including roots and leaves of soybean and maize, as well as roots, leaves, and green fruits of strawberry. For IAA, mean recoveries for the three extracts ranged from 96.82% to 101.37%, with RSD values between 2.74% and 5.27%. For SA, recoveries ranged from 98.13% to 102.98%, with RSD values between 1.92% and 4.01%. The absence of a statistically significant difference between added and found concentrations confirmed the accuracy and reliability of the proposed method. Owing to its simple fabrication, rapid SWV response, low operational cost, and use of environmentally friendly materials, the proposed 3D-CB/HEC-CH platform represents an alternative for efficient monitoring of IAA and SA in agricultural matrices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.