ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Neurorehabilitation for cognitive and motor recovery: mechanisms, interventions, and translational advances.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review synthesizes recent advances in neurorehabilitation, focusing on mechanisms of neural plasticity, glial cell function, and interventions for cognitive and motor recovery. We explore multidisciplinary approaches, including cognitive training, motor rehabilitation, neurostimulation, and regenerative therapies, highlighting their translational potential. Special attention is given to clinically relevant rehabilitation modifiers and complications, including spasticity, frailty, and post-stroke epilepsy, alongside strategies for enhancing quality of life and social reintegration. Emerging technologies such as brain-computer interfaces, virtual reality, and robotics are discussed for their role in personalized rehabilitation. This review emphasizes evidence-based, patient-centered interventions to enhance functional recovery and quality of life, identifying future directions for personalized neurorehabilitation across stroke survivors, elderly, and frail populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.