Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42852115›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

From the bit to the between: an autoethnography of friendship.

Glen Cousquer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Glen CousquerSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop any depth of understanding of friendships, there is a need to integrate holistic epistemological practices that respect the fluid relational and emergent nature of the between space where friends meet. This recognizes friendship as an experience always in process, never a thing or anything like a thing. Multispecies autoethnography is especially well suited to exploring such meetings, for it is concerned with issues of justice, power and freedom and therefore with addressing anthropocentricity. In this study, this qualitative methodology is presented and then developed to provide the reader with a rich ethnographic sense of the author's concerns about the quality of relationship made possible by the traditional bit and the need to prototype and demonstrate co-created alternatives. The work of Simone Weil on attention and Martin Buber on dialogue is emphasized throughout, as a theoretical framework for understanding the ways relationships founded on attentive listening and attunement can be nurtured in partnership. This example is full of misunderstandings and mismeetings, necessitating forgiveness on a regular basis and a commitment to show up, be present and relate. This study is not about friendships between conspecifics; it is about relationality and relational practice and how we practice working equine welfare, through the nurturing of humility and power literacy. This study offers insights and vocabulary that can help the reader develop an awareness-based systems change approach to equine welfare; one that involves listening to ourselves, learning to see, sense, and presence; one that, ultimately, allows equids and humans to nurture the between space where friendship can take root and grow. In doing so, this study provides insights into the possibilities of One Health justice.

Indexed as

attentionawarenesscreativitydeep listeningdialoguefriendshippresence and forgivenessworking equine welfare

Identifiers

PMID42852115
PMCPMC13648277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.