Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42852110›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Shiting Wang, Jiamin Lei, Wenjing Huang, Huajian Chen, Shufang Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shiting WangThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Jiamin LeiThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Wenjing HuangThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Huajian ChenThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Shufang LiThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions in preventing and managing intensive care unit (ICU) delirium and identify the most effective intervention combinations. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I databases from inception to July 3, 2026, supplemented by a hand search of prior meta-analyses. Only randomized trials were included. Meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood estimation and modified Hartung-Knapp confidence intervals were used. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled trials. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results: The search identified 13 randomized controlled trials encompassing 5,525 patients. Multicomponent interventions significantly reduced delirium incidence (RR 0.53, 95% CI [0.36, 0.76], I Conclusion: This study demonstrated that multi-component interventions effectively reduce delirium incidence in critically ill patients. The evidence did not establish that one component combination was superior to another. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024592821.

Indexed as

deliriumintensive care unitmeta-analysismulticomponent non-pharmacological interventionssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42852110
PMCPMC13647169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.