ReviewRadiologia brasileira
Comparison between ultrasound and electromyography for detection of fasciculations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fasciculations are a key manifestation of lower motor neuron dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Al-though electromyography is considered the gold-standard method for the detection of fasciculations, its sensitivity for that purpose depends on the muscle sampled and the examination time. Muscle ultrasound has emerged as a dynamic, noninvasive technique with high sensitivity for detecting spontaneous muscle activity. This updated system-atic review compares ultrasound and electromyography in terms of their performance for the detection of muscle fas-ciculations in ALS, with stratification by muscle group and observation time. A comprehensive search of the literature identified studies evaluating both techniques. Data were synthesized descriptively and, when possible, quantitatively. Ultrasound demonstrated higher or comparable detection rates across most muscle groups, particularly in muscles that are large or deep, such as the biceps brachii, tibialis anterior, and vastus lateralis. Longer ultrasound observation times, especially 60 s, were associated with substantially higher detection rates without a loss of specificity. Although electromyography is still essential for electrophysiological characterization, ultrasound offers broader muscle cover-age, excellent reproducibility, and a noninvasive approach. These findings support muscle ultrasound as a valuable complementary tool for the detection and assessment of fasciculations in patients with motor neuron disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.