ArticleCureus2026
Longitudinal COVID-19 Vaccination Records and SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Older Long-Term Care Facility Residents in Okinawa, Japan: A Retrospective Descriptive Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Repeated COVID-19 vaccination is widely used in long-term care facilities, yet SARS-CoV-2 infection and reinfection continue to occur in frail older populations. Resident-level longitudinal data linking vaccination records with first and recurrent infections remain limited in Japanese long-term care settings. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective descriptive study in a 134-bed long-term care facility in Okinawa, Japan. We linked 976 valid, dated vaccination records for 232 residents from June 7, 2021, through January 16, 2026, to 136 infection episodes among 109 residents from May 22, 2023, through April 30, 2025, using de-identified resident identifiers. Because facility occupancy was dynamic and complete admission and discharge dates were unavailable, not all 232 residents were continuously at risk. Recurrent infection was operationally defined as a new symptomatic episode with a new positive antigen test at least 60 days after the preceding episode, following documented recovery and release from isolation. Analyses were descriptive; incidence rates, vaccine effectiveness, and inferential statistics were not estimated. Results Among 232 residents, 157/232 (67.7%) were female. The mean age at first recorded vaccination was 85.5 ± 8.3 years, and the median total number of documented doses was 4 (interquartile range [IQR], 2-7). Linkage was successful for 89 residents with 114 infection episodes; 20 residents with 22 episodes could not be linked. Linked documented infection occurred in 89/232 residents (38.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 32.3%-44.8%). Among these 89 residents, 65/89 (73.0%) had one episode, 23/89 (25.8%) had two, and 1/89 (1.1%) had three. Recurrent infection occurred in 24/89 residents (27.0%; 95% CI, 18.8%-37.0%). The median interval from the first to second episode was 364 days (IQR, 289.5-575; range, 286-599). Before first infection, the median number of documented doses was 5 (IQR, 2-6; range, 0-8). Among 84 residents with prior documented vaccination, the median interval from the most recent dose to first infection was 49 days (IQR, 14.5-131; range, 3-488). Eight aggregate hospitalizations were documented during infection surveillance but could not be linked to the vaccination roster; one resident died during hospitalization and seven returned to the facility. Conclusions Linking longitudinal vaccination and infection records was feasible and demonstrated a continuing burden of infection and reinfection. However, dynamic occupancy and incomplete time-at-risk data precluded incidence, person-time, dose-specific vaccine-effectiveness, or causal analyses. The dose distribution should not be interpreted as evidence that additional vaccination increased infection risk. Long-term care facilities require layered prevention combining vaccination with rapid testing, infection-control measures, and timely clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.