ReviewFrontiers in dental medicine2026
A review on monitoring orthodontic treatment: from traditional approaches to innovative point-of-care tools.
Review in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthodontic treatment is performed to treat malocclusions by improving oral functions, tooth alignment, and facial esthetics that impact the quality of life of patients significantly. Nevertheless, various factors like complexity of malocclusions, patient compliance, and dental hygiene can influence treatment outcomes. Traditional diagnostic methods such as clinical evaluation, radiography techniques, and dental casts have played a major role in orthodontics and have remained a standard diagnostic method in dentistry to date. On the other hand, these methods are associated with major disadvantages like radiation exposure and invasive procedures. To address these limitations, recent diagnostic methods have identified various biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid and saliva as non-invasive diagnostic methods. These biomarkers can help clinicians in planning orthodontic treatment at the optimal time and determine the appropriate initiation of the treatment. Point-of-care diagnostic tools such as lateral flow assays, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and microfluidic devices, and wearable technologies are emerging as promising alternatives for orthodontic treatment monitoring by offering rapid, cost-effective, and non-invasive alternatives to traditional methods. Recent developments such as incorporation of artificial intelligence and machine learning into orthodontic software attempt to improve the overall monitoring of orthodontic treatment. This review aims to present various traditional and innovative methods that have shown promising outcomes in research, along with insights into emerging areas that serve as potential game changers in orthodontic treatment monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.