ReviewCureus2026
Vitamin D Deficiency in Preclinical Medical Students: Neuroendocrine, Cognitive, and Immune Effects.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin D is increasingly recognized as a multifunctional hormone that extends beyond its traditional role in skeletal health to influence neuroendocrine regulation, cognitive performance, and immune function. Preclinical medical students represent a population at particularly high risk for vitamin D deficiency because of prolonged indoor study, limited sunlight exposure, sedentary lifestyles, and demanding academic schedules. This narrative review examines current evidence regarding vitamin D metabolism and its effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, stress resilience, cognition, neuroprotection, and immune homeostasis, with specific relevance to preclinical medical education. Available studies consistently demonstrate a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among medical students worldwide, with rates frequently exceeding 70%. Emerging evidence suggests that inadequate vitamin D status may contribute to impaired stress adaptation, mood disturbances, neuroinflammation, reduced cognitive performance, and immune dysregulation. However, the evidence is limited by the predominance of observational and cross-sectional studies, variability in definitions of vitamin D sufficiency, heterogeneous study populations, and a lack of prospective investigations evaluating causality. Furthermore, data from U.S. medical student populations are limited. Despite these limitations, optimization of vitamin D status through lifestyle modification, dietary measures, and appropriate supplementation may support student well-being and academic success. Further research is needed to clarify prevalence, determine optimal vitamin D targets for neurocognitive health, and evaluate the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic interventions in medical trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.